THE RESURGENCE OF POLITICAL TERRORISM

THE RESURGENCE OF POLITICAL TERRORISM

 

Department of State United States of America. The Resurgence of Political Terrorism, according to Deputy Secretary Landau has been faught nevertheless considering dynamism and International Relations it requires nowadays, leadership. Secretary of State, Marco Rubio, referred to the 1970’s and 1980’s as a precedent époque in which far left terrorism was developed after hate of civilization, radicalism and alternative labels of the radical left ideological ramifications of anti-capitalism, anarquism, anti-imperialists and communism.

 

Albeit identifying infrastructure as a threat historical faction ‘ANTIFA’ (Anti Fascist Movement) present after great World Wars, and related networks that serve to recognize borders, the definition of Political Terrorism is elaborated after ideological prejudice, a-political facts, political expression and immigration, according to Marco Rubio (Rubio, 2026)..

 

White House Deputy and Homeland Security Advisor, Stephen Miller, described procedure to rule out violence and terrorism appealing to the National Security Presidential Memorandum NSPM and law enforcement SSPM-7. Concerning counterterrorist action, Miller, developed arguments considering the far left militants as a dominant form of political violence warning about designated investigations, law enforcement officials, financial targeting and dismantling of networks.

 

Secretary of the Treasury, Scott Bessent, suggested during Ministerial on the Resurgence of Political Terrorism to evaluate transnational design and lack of terrorism elaborating a Nation’s identity and Realpolitik aiming to define responsibilities and danger.

 

Considering Political delimitation of subject, ideological boundaries, Marxism, radical Islam and sophisticated networks as variables towards the identification of a Global Financial System and domestic approach towards collaboration, commitments and jurisdiction that lacks uncertainty and is not contrary to Constitutional Rights the application of authority stands for mission and Institutionalism.

 

Albeit Secretary of State focused discussion in domestic approach to terrorism after September 11^th, 2001 a singular event with great extent, blind spots and Doctrine are not unattended nor un Constitutional.

 

 

Key Words

Global Financial System vs. Illicit Funding     Depriving Resources      Sanctions   Accountability      sacred responsibilities         global coalition           fundamental character

 

 

 

 

PRIME MINISTER OF THE REPUBLIC OF IRAQ VISITS UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

 WASHINGTON DC. Prime Minister of the Republic of Iraq visited, during the first week of July 2026, United States of America developing a bilateral agenda with the President Donald Trump and the Pentagon. According to the leader of the Executive power relationship with the Republic of Iraq has improved after decades of development and War identifying current époque as outstanding.

 

“We are going to have a great relationship with Iraq”, signaled President Donald Trump during meeting in the White House (Trump,2026) (White House).

 

VIRGINIA. During visit to United States of America Secretary of Defense, Pete Hegseth, manifested objective to strengthened commercial and defense cooperation with Iraqi Security Forces (ISF) after lead of elected Prime Minister, Ali-al-Zaidi.

 

Military approach developed by Secretary of Defense identifies fighting ISIS in the Middle East as primary objective nevertheless pretending to conclude Counter ISIS mission; establishing a turning point after Sadam Hussein as a historical reference for the Republic of Iraq (Hegseth, 2026) (SecWar).

 

Even though Hussein’s lead was of great influence for previous paradigms for constitution and identity, elected Prime Minister becomes a referential figure for sovereignty in the Middle East.

 

Concerning War between the Islamic Republic of Iran and the United States of America, Prime Minister Ali-al-Zaidi stated bilateral objective with the Pentagon to disarm Iran aligned militias.

 

Key Words

Commercial and defense cooperation          

THE ANKARA SUMMIT DECLARATION (2026)

Ankara. During the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) Summit held in Ankara, Turkey in July the Ankara Summit Declaration was created with the objective to establish the Euro Atlantic Security agenda content.

 

Concerning Washington Treaty (Article 5) , foundation principles related to the defense of Ukraine as a member of the military alliance conceptual establishment of objectives to preserve freedom, sovereignty  and territorial integrity of the Republic of Ukraine  determines extent of the Ukraine Support Loan defined in the Ankara Summit Declaration.

 

Albeit interest to avoid nuclear capabilities in NATO territories the determination of the governments, Procurement Deals and Industrial Commitments are normed to defend production and shared security, according to the Secretary General of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization, Mark Ruthe, when referring to the War in the Middle East and the Islamic Republic of Iran (Ruthe, 2026) (NATO News).

 

Referring to accelerated production, identifying interest to determine Fuel Supply Chains for War fighting including storage and distribution of resource and pipelines manifests interest of Multilateral Military Alliance to deter commercial obstruction in the Middle East.

 

Albeit trade barriers have been approximated by strategic action, Ankara Summit Declaration defines ambition towards precision strikes, air and missile defense, cutting edge technologies and intelligence capabilities for combat advantage including the Interoperable Transatlantic Warfighting Cloud (Ruthe,2026) (NATO News).

 

After strengthening cooperation and defining security policies, delivering objectives and defining the Republic of Estonia as host for the next Summit, transformation of the Defense Principles Summit concluded in Ankara, July 2026.

 

Key Words

Ankara Summit Declaration     Ukraine Support Loan            Procurement Deals     Procurement Deals

NATO SUMMIT IN ANKARA TRANSFORMATION OF DEFENSE SYSTEM

 

Ankara. During the month of July 2026, North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) gathered foundation members motivating Military Alliance towards a stronger future. President of the Republic of Turkey, Recep Erdogan, hosted meeting in Ankara confronting threats after peace dividens gathered after the end of the Cold War.

 

President Edrogan promoted a strategic transformation of the Defense System of the Military Alliance.signaling a turning point to confront the War between the Republic of Ukraine and the Russian Federation aiming a fair share ‘Border Share’ in NATO (Erdogan, 2026) (Al Jazeera English).

 

During 2028 the Republic of Turkey will command an Air Policing Mission in the Republic of Estonia including policing Turk F16 Jets and secured Defense Partnership with the Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland with the objective to deter, with a dimensional depth, Military Operations in the territory of Estonia.

 

Security and Defense Alliance with Great Britain will develop competences under the domain of technological superiority, sustainable capacity and scaled conjoint work for the North Atlantic Treaty Organization.

 

Albeit Turkey has covered War in Ukraine, advocated diplomacy and dialogue concerns expert defense products expected after transformation in Defense System, nevertheless glorious after joining NATO remembering achievements perceived after referred commitments acquired in the Hague in 2025 including responsibility and obligations.

 

Key Words

Vehicles        warships        F16 Jets         Peace Dividends       Border Share         Reaction Force

(EU) as compliment