jueves, 20 de agosto de 2026

REPUBLIC OF COLOMBIA JOINS SHIELD OF THE AMERICAS

 After announcement made by the President of the Republic of Colombia, Ebelardo de la Espriella, of joining Shield of the Americas, implications concerning the South American Country’s request and authorization to conduct joint military action aiming ‘Narco terrorists’ ‘disidents’ and ‘Fuerza Armada Revolucionaria de Colombia’ was approved after the result of investigation made by Secretary of Defense of the United States of America, Pete Hegseth during the month of August, 2026.

 

Considering transition of mandate and Institutionalism after a pacific Presidency of leftist, Gustavo Petro, the initiation of Military Action conducted by Colombia as member of Regional Alliance Shield of the Americas was conducted successfully following a Multinational Strategic Operation order.

 

Albeit juridical analysis concerning processed Administrative permission to evaluate Constitutionalism determined order of operation according to a logistic approach of permission of a Foreign Troop in relation to the National Army of the Republic of Colombia, authorization provided to multilateral Alliance transcended according to organization, direct participation, definition of concrete objectives, economic strategy and Operation’s reach  (Blu Radio, 2026).

 

According to Political Analyst, Simon Whistler, the definition of profile of President Ebelardo de la Espriella, develops after constituting War Advocacy labeling Total War as a National Front nevertheless including clearance of domestic facts and guerillas to confront new Military Direction.

 

First Military Action from multilateral organism was conducted by U.S. SOUTHCOM and Fuerza Naval del Pacífico (FNP) of the Republic of Colombia nevertheless the interception of ‘cargo vessel’ carrying chlorohydrate of cocaine and capture of suspects was executed in the Pacific Ocean (NTN24, 2026).

 

Initial Action, according to de la Espriella, represents an 'Institutional Dialogue', the respect for the 'independence' of command and 'Constitutional division of powers and responsibilities', as well as, 'Justice' in a democratic regime developing War Advocacy far from undermining democratic parameters. According to War Fronts Analyst, Simon Whistler, the President’s new identity is distinguished in a multilateral order transcending Executive Decrees and Security Pacts to position government in accordance with ‘narco insurgence’ (Espriella, 2026) (x.com @ABDELAESPRIELLA)(Whistler, 2026)[1] (War Fronts).


Albeit joint publication was held according to bilateral and multinational agenda, President of the United States, Donald Trump, agreed to liberate tax to the South American Country during humanitarian crisis. 

 

Key Words



[1] Total War       War Advocacy        Triple C Hemisferio Occidental

 

lunes, 17 de agosto de 2026

ARTICLE 5. MEMBERS OF THE NORTH ATLANTIC TREATY ORGANIZATION RESETTLING UKRAINE

 

Since the occupation of Crimea (2014) the State of the Republic of Ukraine and the Russian Federation have developed conflict and War concerning the extent of sovereignty and constitutionalism.

 

According to multilateral confrontation of War, Article 5. of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), has determined the involvement of the Allies of the Republic of Ukraine considering the defense principles after the attack of a Country member of the Alliance specifying the Republic of Ukraine after the occupation of Crimea.

 

After years of War the implication of multilateralism guiding Frontline to execute direct attacks to the Russian Federation has determined a change, according to U.S. Air Force Veteran and Nuclear and Missile Operation Officer, Jake Broe, referring to a ‘pre-mobilization’ or ‘mobilization’ to resettle Crimea as a territory of the Republic of Ukraine (Broe, 2026)[1].

 

Albeit sovereignty determined the population of Crimea represented a ‘cleavaged’ debate  concerning Constitutionalism, territorial laws, maps and War the non-binding movement that approved Crimea to be territorial part of the Russian Federation lacked free elections nor other binding mechanisms of, plebiscite, to modify written norm, Constitution or legal status of territory that has already initiated a counter movement to determine if legal re-settlement of Ukraine would End War.

 

U.S. Air Force  Veteran, Jake Broe, analyzes in transmission “August Q/A” the extent of Article 5. Of NATO if non annexation is accepted and occupation of Crimea is outlawed identifying Article 5. as the normed multilateral confrontation for Defense as the formal approach for International Law and territorial Ukraine.

 

Considering annexation as a sovereign movement justifying Russian defense of citizens, the legal notion of property rights and guarantees does not refer to a territory albeit is scrutinized if other legal status, such as, deportation vs. leaving occupied territories and Ukraine accepting citizens or a resettling movement as Resolving status to end War repositions the State as the most relevant form of organization and peace.

 

Albeit negotiation has been appointed by multilateralism, Russians were expelled from 26 villages claimed under their control as well as an official rejection of Ukraine describing the Black Sea as area of interest to achieve ceasefire defining attacks during the month of August as a meticulous matter for the definition of the Air Defense System and leveling of maps.

 

To compliment analysis of International Law, Broe, adds Reuters Headline to illustrate status to Organize Military Action after notion of “fearing a Russian false flag strike” (Strzelecki, 2026) (Sytas, 2026) (Reuters) appealing to movement to re-settle Ukraine and identity as a variable of War.

 

 

Key Words

 Multilateralism                Civil War                  identity                  mobilization          liberation of villages



[1] https://youtu.be/BMspMxAXQEM?si=HEUHkzEIQt3PXMMJ

lunes, 10 de agosto de 2026

LEGISLATION CONCERNING ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN

 

U.S. Senator, Ted Cruz, referred to War between the United States of America and the Islamic Republic of Iran signaling Legislation and Constitutional approach towards the President’s Authority. According to the Constitution of the United States the President is entitled to Direct the Army of the United States from Executive branch as well as to create a normed approach towards sanctions.

 

Even though Senator identifies Theocracy as a threat, the Constitution and division of powers appoint the President as the leading command to determine launching Military Action towards the Islamic Republic of Iran (Cruz, 2026) (Iranintlenglish).

 

Albeit the Constituent and Covenant of the civic development of the American Nation is the guiding principle to defend the Alliance of the United States with the State of Israel, Prime Minister, Benjamin Netanyahu, manifested during the month of August 2026 the status of an unsettled negotiation between the American Authority and Arab Partners (Netanyahu, 2026) (Iranintlenglish).

 

Even though Diplomatic development has concurred ceasefire, President of the Republic of Iran, Masoud Pezeshkian, agreed to the defense the fundamental rights of its citizens as well as promote diplomacy and resist external forces (Pezeshkian, 2026) (Brics_Countries).

 

Key Words

  Covenant          Theocracy

martes, 21 de julio de 2026

THE RESURGENCE OF POLITICAL TERRORISM

THE RESURGENCE OF POLITICAL TERRORISM

 

Department of State United States of America. The Resurgence of Political Terrorism, according to Deputy Secretary Landau has been faught nevertheless considering dynamism and International Relations it requires nowadays, leadership. Secretary of State, Marco Rubio, referred to the 1970’s and 1980’s as a precedent époque in which far left terrorism was developed after hate of civilization, radicalism and alternative labels of the radical left ideological ramifications of anti-capitalism, anarquism, anti-imperialists and communism.

 

Albeit identifying infrastructure as a threat historical faction ‘ANTIFA’ (Anti Fascist Movement) present after great World Wars, and related networks that serve to recognize borders, the definition of Political Terrorism is elaborated after ideological prejudice, a-political facts, political expression and immigration, according to Marco Rubio (Rubio, 2026)..

 

White House Deputy and Homeland Security Advisor, Stephen Miller, described procedure to rule out violence and terrorism appealing to the National Security Presidential Memorandum NSPM and law enforcement SSPM-7. Concerning counterterrorist action, Miller, developed arguments considering the far left militants as a dominant form of political violence warning about designated investigations, law enforcement officials, financial targeting and dismantling of networks.

 

Secretary of the Treasury, Scott Bessent, suggested during Ministerial on the Resurgence of Political Terrorism to evaluate transnational design and lack of terrorism elaborating a Nation’s identity and Realpolitik aiming to define responsibilities and danger.

 

Considering Political delimitation of subject, ideological boundaries, Marxism, radical Islam and sophisticated networks as variables towards the identification of a Global Financial System and domestic approach towards collaboration, commitments and jurisdiction that lacks uncertainty and is not contrary to Constitutional Rights the application of authority stands for mission and Institutionalism.

 

Albeit Secretary of State focused discussion in domestic approach to terrorism after September 11th, 2001 a singular event with great extent, blind spots and Doctrine are not unattended nor un Constitutional.

 

 

Key Words

Global Financial System vs. Illicit Funding     Depriving Resources      Sanctions   Accountability      sacred responsibilities         global coalition           fundamental character

 

 

 

 

miércoles, 15 de julio de 2026

PRIME MINISTER OF THE REPUBLIC OF IRAQ VISITS UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

 WASHINGTON DC. Prime Minister of the Republic of Iraq visited, during the first week of July 2026, United States of America developing a bilateral agenda with the President Donald Trump and the Pentagon. According to the leader of the Executive power relationship with the Republic of Iraq has improved after decades of development and War identifying current époque as outstanding.

 

“We are going to have a great relationship with Iraq”, signaled President Donald Trump during meeting in the White House (Trump,2026) (White House).

 

VIRGINIA. During visit to United States of America Secretary of Defense, Pete Hegseth, manifested objective to strengthened commercial and defense cooperation with Iraqi Security Forces (ISF) after lead of elected Prime Minister, Ali-al-Zaidi.

 

Military approach developed by Secretary of Defense identifies fighting ISIS in the Middle East as primary objective nevertheless pretending to conclude Counter ISIS mission; establishing a turning point after Sadam Hussein as a historical reference for the Republic of Iraq (Hegseth, 2026) (SecWar).

 

Even though Hussein’s lead was of great influence for previous paradigms for constitution and identity, elected Prime Minister becomes a referential figure for sovereignty in the Middle East.

 

Concerning War between the Islamic Republic of Iran and the United States of America, Prime Minister Ali-al-Zaidi stated bilateral objective with the Pentagon to disarm Iran aligned militias.

 

Key Words

Commercial and defense cooperation          

martes, 14 de julio de 2026

THE ANKARA SUMMIT DECLARATION (2026)


Ankara. During the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) Summit held in Ankara, Turkey in July the Ankara Summit Declaration was created with the objective to establish the Euro Atlantic Security agenda content.

 

Concerning Washington Treaty (Article 5) , foundation principles related to the defense of Ukraine as a member of the military alliance conceptual establishment of objectives to preserve freedom, sovereignty  and territorial integrity of the Republic of Ukraine  determines extent of the Ukraine Support Loan defined in the Ankara Summit Declaration.

 

Albeit interest to avoid nuclear capabilities in NATO territories the determination of the governments, Procurement Deals and Industrial Commitments are normed to defend production and shared security, according to the Secretary General of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization, Mark Ruthe, when referring to the War in the Middle East and the Islamic Republic of Iran (Ruthe, 2026) (NATO News).

 

Referring to accelerated production, identifying interest to determine Fuel Supply Chains for War fighting including storage and distribution of resource and pipelines manifests interest of Multilateral Military Alliance to deter commercial obstruction in the Middle East.

 

Albeit trade barriers have been approximated by strategic action, Ankara Summit Declaration defines ambition towards precision strikes, air and missile defense, cutting edge technologies and intelligence capabilities for combat advantage including the Interoperable Transatlantic Warfighting Cloud (Ruthe,2026) (NATO News).

 

After strengthening cooperation and defining security policies, delivering objectives and defining the Republic of Estonia as host for the next Summit, transformation of the Defense Principles Summit concluded in Ankara, July 2026.

 

Key Words

Ankara Summit Declaration     Ukraine Support Loan            Procurement Deals     Procurement Deals

jueves, 9 de julio de 2026

NATO SUMMIT IN ANKARA TRANSFORMATION OF DEFENSE SYSTEM

 

Ankara. During the month of July 2026, North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) gathered foundation members motivating Military Alliance towards a stronger future. President of the Republic of Turkey, Recep Erdogan, hosted meeting in Ankara confronting threats after peace dividens gathered after the end of the Cold War.

 

President Edrogan promoted a strategic transformation of the Defense System of the Military Alliance.signaling a turning point to confront the War between the Republic of Ukraine and the Russian Federation aiming a fair share ‘Border Share’ in NATO (Erdogan, 2026) (Al Jazeera English).

 

During 2028 the Republic of Turkey will command an Air Policing Mission in the Republic of Estonia including policing Turk F16 Jets and secured Defense Partnership with the Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland with the objective to deter, with a dimensional depth, Military Operations in the territory of Estonia.

 

Security and Defense Alliance with Great Britain will develop competences under the domain of technological superiority, sustainable capacity and scaled conjoint work for the North Atlantic Treaty Organization.

 

Albeit Turkey has covered War in Ukraine, advocated diplomacy and dialogue concerns expert defense products expected after transformation in Defense System, nevertheless glorious after joining NATO remembering achievements perceived after referred commitments acquired in the Hague in 2025 including responsibility and obligations.

 

Key Words

Vehicles        warships        F16 Jets         Peace Dividends       Border Share         Reaction Force

(EU) as compliment

REPUBLIC OF COLOMBIA JOINS SHIELD OF THE AMERICAS

  After announcement made by the President of the Republic of Colombia, Ebelardo de la Espriella, of joining Shield of the Americas, implica...