Were
recent events concerning the offering of capital, infrastructure and military
incentives to Ukrainian President, Volodomir Zelenski, a block position towards
aiming Russia?
Even
though initiative to soften direct attack in The Land of the Border were
considered positive for achieving a peaceful transition away from conflict, the
development of the content of Zelenski’s Ten Points was become an focal point
for third parties, mediators and factions involved. Considering the
prolongation of Total War, concept
involving the entire population of a country, its economy and political decision
making, has drawn a line between Russia’s offensive characteristics juxtaposed
to past historic events dealing with Crimea and, since 2022, political warfare
in circumscribed territories. Even though diplomatic ties have manifested
alternative mediation with economic blocks like the European Union and
humanitarian aid negotiated by institutions like the Vatican and Pope Francis the cease fire scenarios intending to end
conflict have initiated Zelenski’s intend to position détente albeit damage and casualties as an extent of conflict.
Determining
the impact of a Treaty, conceptualizing the Ten Points and developing Zelenski’s
agenda as a priority to reach consented post hoc historic agreement with
Vladimir Putin would catalyze work towards peace, nevertheless, under the
agreed scenario between Russia and Ukraine. If Zelenski continues formal ties
by means of the Ten Points, the Russian front wouldn’t need to evaluate arm building
as a mercantilist way to percieve détente, nevertheless with no opposition allies
can sign Peace and establish Ten Points .
Is there
an opposition towards an agreement? Has the war incentive become greater than
Peace achievements?
Key Words
opposition Ten Points
