ZELENSKI’S TEN POINTS

 

Were recent events concerning the offering of capital, infrastructure and military incentives to Ukrainian President, Volodomir Zelenski, a block position towards aiming Russia?

 

Even though initiative to soften direct attack in The Land of the Border were considered positive for achieving a peaceful transition away from conflict, the development of the content of Zelenski’s Ten Points was become an focal point for third parties, mediators and factions involved. Considering the prolongation of Total War, concept involving the entire population of a country, its economy and political decision making, has drawn a line between Russia’s offensive characteristics juxtaposed to past historic events dealing with Crimea and, since 2022, political warfare in circumscribed territories. Even though diplomatic ties have manifested alternative mediation with economic blocks like the European Union and humanitarian aid negotiated by institutions like the Vatican and Pope Francis  the cease fire scenarios intending to end conflict have initiated Zelenski’s intend to position détente albeit damage and casualties as an extent of conflict.

 

Determining the impact of a Treaty, conceptualizing the Ten Points and developing Zelenski’s agenda as a priority to reach consented post hoc historic agreement with Vladimir Putin would catalyze work towards peace, nevertheless, under the agreed scenario between Russia and Ukraine. If Zelenski continues formal ties by means of the Ten Points, the Russian front wouldn’t need to evaluate arm building as a mercantilist way to percieve détente, nevertheless with no opposition allies can sign Peace and establish Ten Points .

 

Is there an opposition towards an agreement? Has the war incentive become greater than Peace achievements?

Key Words

opposition        Ten Points